BUSH AND FOX IN
LOCK-STEP ON
ILLEGALS IN AMERICA
By
Lynn Stuter
May
2, 2006
NewsWithViews.com
News last week brought
the startling, if
not shocking, announcement that the American government has been
providing the
Mexican government with the location of citizen groups and citizen
volunteers
acting as extra eyes and ears to the American Border Patrol. The shock
to many
is that the American government would do such a thing, putting the
lives of
innocent Americans in jeopardy.
Then came the no less
shocking news that
Mexican consulate officials were provided office space in the Tucson
offices of
the U.S. Border Patrol in February, 2006, and are being allowed to
dictate
Border Patrol agent’s activities. At least one agent resigned in
protest.
And, of course, as is
usual when the
government gets caught engaging in unethical (or treasonous)
activities, its
standard operating procedure (SOP) is to deny, deny, deny. However,
information
that has only been given to the government by the citizen groups
helping patrol
the border, and citizen groups acting in other parts of the United
States to
curb illegal alien activity, has ended up in the hands of the Mexican
government and found its way to a Mexican
government
website. This is information that goes far beyond the requirements
of the
Vienna Convention on Consular Relations of 1963, requiring that
government
detained foreign nationals be given access to their consulate. It
doesn’t take
a rocket scientist to deduce that it was the United States government
who
supplied the Mexican government with that information.
Let’s be clear here.
We are not talking
about immigration — people obtaining the required documents and
entering the
United States legally; we are talking about illegal aliens, foreign
nationals
entering the United States at other than legal border checkpoints and
without
the required identification or documents. And let’s be very clear on
what this
represents. Twelve to 20 million illegal aliens residing within the
borders of
the United States constitutes an illegal invasion. When the majority of
those
illegal aliens come from one country, said illegal invasion becomes an
act of
aggression; in fact, an act of war. That country is Mexico.
Article III, § 3,
Constitution, United
States of America: “Treason, proof and punishment.” Treason
against the
United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in
adhering to
their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be
convicted of
treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act,
or on
confession in open court.
The congress shall
have power to declare
the punishment of treason, but no attainder of treason shall work
corruption of
blood, or forfeiture except during the life of the person attainted.”
In providing a foreign
nation (Mexico)
information deleterious to the health and safety of American citizens,
those
responsible have committed an act of treason in “adhering to their
enemies,
giving them aid and comfort” when the enemy is levying war against
America.
Who is ultimately
responsible for this act
of treason?
Twice in the last
month, Americans have
been witness to the orchestrated demonstrations of illegal aliens in
major
American cities. On May 1, 2006, the intent was to show Americans how
much
economic damage the illegal aliens, the foreign aggressors, could do in
our
country by not showing up for work. Sympathetic employers and
businesses closed
their doors that day in a show of support for these illegal invaders.
But the effort fell
flat as the economic
impact wasn’t even a blip on the radar screen of American commerce. The
effect
was however, a more than adequate demonstration to the American people
of the
sheer numbers of illegal aliens being allowed to live without fear of
deportation in the United States while they take jobs from the people
of the
United States who need them. In turn, the money being made by these
illegal
invaders is being sent out of the United States to Mexico while
American
taxpayers foot the medical and welfare bills of the illegal aliens, and
while
the companies employing the illegal aliens pocket the profit from not
paying
taxes or benefits, paying lower wages but maintaining comparable market
price.
And while these
illegal invaders blocked
streets, caused congestion, and cost American taxpayers the overtime
and extra
police needed to monitor their illegal activities, not one illegal was
deported
as required by law. And with the exception of possibly the Honorable
Representative Ron Paul (Texas) and the Honorable Representative Tom
Tancredo
(Colorado), not one United States Senator or Representative had the
gumption to
stand up and demand these illegal invaders be rounded up and deported.
Some explanation of
why this did not occur
can be found in an article
written by Melissa Sattly on August 19, 2001 and published in the Brownsville
Herald. In the article a Mexican citizen and former government
official is
quoted as stating, “In Mexico, Bush is viewed as a friend because he is
making
changes in the United States to open borders, fight the trucking issue
and
promote immigration reform.”
The article has other
telling statements
to make, “Immigration is another hot topic of dialogue between Fox and
Bush. In
past speeches the Mexican president has advocated an open border policy
and
amnesty for more than 3 million Mexicans living illegally in the United
States.
Bush has proposed
granting the amnesty and
supports a guest worker program, sponsored by Republican Sen. Phil
Gramm of
Texas, that would offer limited work permits to Mexicans working
certain jobs
in the United States.”
The article also
allows as how while
governor of Guanajuato, Mexico, Fox “saw firsthand the powerful draw of
jobs
north of the border.”
All of this according
to the passions,
prejudices and opinions of President George W Bush in complete
indifference to
the law that requires illegal aliens to be deported to their nation of
origin.
We are a constitutional republic, not a democracy in which the
passions,
opinions and prejudices of the majority are visited upon the minority
in an act
of oppression; constitutional republic vs democracy; rule of law vs
passions,
opinions and prejudices.
America was
established on the rule of
law, not as a democracy. The law says these illegal invaders must be
deported.
It is the responsibility of our elected representatives in Washington
DC to see
that they are deported. The cost to American taxpayers in wages,
benefits,
crime, medical, schooling and welfare has and will continue to far
exceed the
cost of deportation.
But in his total
disregard for the law in
pursuit of his passions, opinions and prejudices, it doesn’t take a
rocket
scientist to figure out why President George W Bush has done nothing
about the
12 to 20 million illegal aliens now residing in the United States; 9 to
17
million more than was estimated in 2001. Further, it doesn’t take a
rocket
scientist to figure out that the actions of government employees under
his
leadership is a direct reflection of his policies; in this instance,
providing
information deleterious to the health and safety of American citizens
to the
Mexican government due to Bush and Fox being of one accord regarding
the
illegal invasion of America by citizens of Mexico.
That the United States
government is
supplying information to a foreign government deleterious to the lives
and
safety of American citizens is an act of treason. It is also an
impeachable
offense that President George W Bush has and is allowing this to
happen. It
becomes apparent that his allegiance to Fox and the nation of Mexico is
greater
than his allegiance to the United States of America which is also an
impeachable offense.
And then, of course,
there is that
ever-present fact that if GW was serious about stopping terrorism, he
would
secure our southern border and stop the illegal invasion. It becomes
very
obvious that the War on Terror is not about terrorism but about control
and
oppression of the American people.
Along this same line,
Title IV of Public
Law 107-56, the U.S. Patriot Act, is entitled “Protecting the Border”.
Subtitle
A of Title IV addresses the northern border (with Canada); there is no
provision for protecting the southern border. Now one would assume,
given the
greater potential for terrorists to cross the southern border, that
this
section would make provision for that probability, and if GW was
serious about
protecting the United States of America from terrorists, the Patriot
Act would
carry such a provision. That it doesn’t makes it apparent that GW wants
that
border left open to terrorists and further, that the Patriot Act is
about
controlling Americans, not stopping terrorism.
Former impeached
president William
Jefferson Clinton desecrated the Oval Office by playing around with
Monica
Lewinsky. Is illegal spying on the American people any different? Is
lying to
the American people any different? Is invading Iraq under a false flag
any
different? Is initiating the phony War on Terror under a false flag any
different? Is exerting undue influence on a supposedly independent
commission
investigating 9/11 any different? Is illegally databasing millions of
telephone
records from AT&T, Verizon and BellSouth any different? Is
committing acts
of treason any different?
In short, President
George Walker Bush is
no better than William Jefferson Clinton was. To claim Clinton was
wrong
because he is a Democrat but Bush is right because he is a Republican
is the
epitome of hypocrisy. Republican or Democrat, right is right, wrong is
wrong,
and treason is treason.
George Walker Bush
deserves to be, and
should be, impeached. For providing the Mexican government with
information
deleterious to the health and safety of American citizens, he should be
charged
with treason.
© 2006 Lynn M. Stuter - All
Rights
Reserved
Sign Up For Free E-Mail Alerts
Mother and wife, Stuter has
spent the
past ten years researching systems theory with a particular emphasis on
education. She home schooled two daughters, now grown and on their own.
She has
worked with legislators, both state and federal, on issues pertaining
to
systems governance and education reform. She networks nationwide with
other
researchers and citizens concerned with the transformation of our
nation. She
has traveled the United States and lived overseas.
Web site: www.learn-usa.com
E-Mail: lmstuter@learn-usa.com
