BILL
MOYERS' NOW COMMENTS On THE
PATRIOT ACT
At the same time the Bush
administration is probing into your private life, it is shielding
itself from all public scrutiny. It has shredded the Freedom of
Information Act; it has locked away presidential records not only of
the current administration but of administrations going all the way
back to Reagan as well; and it has even locked up George W. Bush's
gubernatorial records so that the people of Texas can't see what he did
to them while serving as their governor.
Not surprisingly, the Bush
administration is also using anti-terror
legislation and executive orders to protect its corporate sponsors from
scrutiny and from prosecution. The drug company Eli Lilly, for
instance, was recently granted immunity from all cases brought against
it-–even those initiated long before the war on terrorism--related to a
vaccine it manufactured that turned out to cause autism in many
children. (Eli Lilly contributed over $3 million in the last two
election campaigns.) The Bush administration also protected the Bayer
Corporation's patent on the antibiotic Cipro throughout the anthrax
scare, whereas other countries, such as Canada, broke that patent so
that other companies could make cheaper versions of the drug in case of
emergency.
It is interesting to note that
during WWII Bayer was part of the I.G.
Farben conglomerate, the top financial contributor to the Nazi Party.
I.G. Farben produced petrol and rubber for the Nazi war machine and it
manufactured the Zyklon B gas that was used to exterminate millions of
Jews and other "enemies of the state." In exchange for these services,
the Nazis provided Farben (and Bayer) with lucrative government
contracts and with slave labor from concentration camps.
Under George W. Bush's kinder,
gentler fascism, U.S. corporations are
now allowed to do business with the Homeland Security Department even
if they cheat the government out of vast amounts of tax revenues by
setting up offshore business fronts in the Caribbean Islands. It used
to be that tax-evaders were tracked down and punished. Now they're
rewarded with fat government contracts. Could the slave labor be far
behind?
If only this were the extent
of the Bush administration's ramble down
the road to fascism. Way back in November of 2001, William Safire
accused the Bush administration of "seizing dictatorial power." Well,
Mr. Safire, you ain't seen nothing yet. Just when you thought it
couldn't get any worse, just when you thought we can't lose any more of
our liberties and still call ourselves a "free society," we learn that
the Bush administration wants to take away even more of our rights. A
secret document was just leaked out of John Ashcroft's Justice
Department and turned over to the Center for Public Integrity. Titled
the Domestic Security Enhancement Act of 2003, this document turns out
to be a draft of new anti-terrorism legislation, a vastly more muscular
sequel to Patriot Act. If passed, it would grant the executive branch
sweeping new powers of domestic surveillance, and it would eliminate
most of the few remaining checks and balances that protect us from
tyranny.
It's the Patriot Act on
steroids. Charles Lewis of the Center for
Public Integrity shared this document with Bill Moyers, who examined it
on NOW, his weekly PBS program. That episode aired Friday, February 7,
yet even now no mainstream news broadcaster has picked up this
incredible story. Read the NOW transcript and see the document itself
online at http://www.pbs.org/now/.
You can also read the Center for Public Integrity's analysis of the
document at http://www.publicintegrity.org/.
Dr. David Cole, a Law
professor at Georgetown University and author of
Terrorism and the Constitution assessed the document, saying, "I think
this is a quite radical proposal. It authorizes secret arrests. It
would give the Attorney General essentially unchecked authority to
deport anyone who he thought was a danger to our economic interests. It
would strip citizenship from people for lawful political associations."
"Secret arrests”? Did we hear
that right? It seems that the Homeland
Security Department (HSD) is about to become the KGB. The first Patriot
Act already allows for people to be locked up indefinitely without a
lawyer and without being charged with a crime. If Patriot Act II
passes, then arrests would also be secret. That means that dissenters
(or anyone else, for that matter) could disappear without a trace, just
as they did in Nazi Germany, in Stalinist Russia, and in Pinochet's
Chile.
Patriot Act II would also
grant even more immunity to Big Business. A
corporation could pour toxins into your local river, for instance, and
you wouldn't know about it until all the fish died and your neighbor’s
kids were born with missing limbs. And then when you went to court and
demanded to know what the
company was dumping in
your river, the company could deny you that
information on the grounds that it's a national security secret.
JimHightower put it this way: "All a company has to do to shield
anything it wants to keep from the public eye--say, an embarrassing
chemical spill--is give the documents to the Homeland Security
Department and call them "critical infrastructure information."
Ah, but there's even more to
be concerned about here. The document was
created back in early January, but so far it appears that the only
members of Congress who even know of its existence are House Speaker
Dennis Hastert and Vice-president Dick Cheney. (The Vice-president
presides over the Senate, which makes him a member of the legislative
branch as well as the executive branch.) This raises a troubling
question: Why has the White House been sitting on this bill for a
month? If the CEOs down at Bush, Inc. really believe that they need
these broad new powers to protect us from terrorists, why not roll out
that bill and start the debate? The answer is all too plain. In all
likelihood, the Bush administration was planning to avoid debate
entirely by springing this bill on the American people in the midst of
a perceived national crisis. Perhaps during the war with Iraq, for
instance. Or perhaps in the aftermath of the next terrorist attack. Or
perhaps right after the Reichstag fire.
Had some courageous soul not
leaked this document out of the Justice
Department, the White House might easily have succeeded in passing it
through Congress without debate in the midst of our next perceived
national crisis, much as it did with the first Patriot Act in the
aftermath of the September 11 attacks. A thorough debate of this bill
right now, under fairly stable circumstances, would defuse it and
prevent its passage even under more frightening circumstances later on.
There's just one problem. The debate can't begin until more Americans
know about this bill, but so far the Washington Post is the only major
news outlet to even MENTION this story since Bill Moyers broke it on
Friday night.
Here's
what you can do to help
First,
forward this link to everyone you know. Second, send an email to the Center
for Public Integrity and to Bill Moyers and the
producers of NOW thanking them
for
breaking this story. Here's a sample message that you can use or
modify:
I am writing to express
my heartfelt thanks and admiration to the Center for Public Integrity,
to Bill Moyers, to the producers of NOW, and especially to the brave
unnamed patriot who valued the Bill of Rights over his or her own
personal well-being and, at great personal risk, leaked a draft of the
Domestic Security Enhancement Act of 2003 out of the Justice Department.
Sincerely,(Your name, city,
and state.)
Center for Public Integity: |mailto:feedback@publicintegrity.org|.
NOW with Bill Moyers: |mailto:now@thirteen.org|.
|click here to read:|
THE USA PATRIOT ACT
A Legal Analysis by
Charles Doyle
Senior Specialist, American Law Division
published online as a PDA document
Also read |Secret
Patriot Act II to give Hitler's Powers to Bush|